+16.8%
SNPS vs ZM
+15.8%
+1.0%
-31.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | +7.9% | -7.4% | -2.7% |
| 7D | -0.2% | +6.8% | -7.0% | -2.9% |
| 30D | -8.0% | +0.1% | -8.2% | -8.2% |
| 3M | +12.5% | -7.5% | +20.0% | +14.7% |
| 6M | -10.5% | -8.4% | -2.0% | -8.7% |
| YTD | -1.6% | +13.7% | -15.3% | -6.9% |
| 1Y | +16.8% | +15.9% | +0.9% | +11.2% |
| All | +16.8% | +15.8% | +1.0% | +11.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling