-15.6%
SNPS vs ALHC
+136.3%
-151.9%
-42.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.4% | 0.0% | -5.4% | -5.4% |
| 7D | -11.0% | -0.6% | -10.4% | -11.0% |
| 30D | -1.7% | -1.0% | -0.7% | -1.7% |
| 3M | -20.4% | -10.2% | -10.2% | -20.6% |
| 6M | -8.6% | -28.3% | +19.7% | -8.5% |
| YTD | -16.2% | -31.4% | +15.3% | -16.0% |
| 1Y | -34.6% | -16.9% | -17.6% | -34.8% |
| All | -15.6% | +136.3% | -151.9% | -17.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling