+87.2%
SNOW vs INFQ
-6.9%
+94.1%
-33.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | INFQ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -2.9% | +1.7% | -0.9% |
| 7D | +8.4% | +4.8% | +3.6% | +7.8% |
| 30D | -1.0% | +13.4% | -14.4% | -2.5% |
| 3M | +38.3% | -3.3% | +41.6% | +37.3% |
| 6M | +81.3% | +13.7% | +67.6% | +85.5% |
| All | +87.2% | -6.9% | +94.1% | +96.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside INFQ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus INFQ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × INFQ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded INFQ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling