+4,800.5%
SNDK vs ZETA
+37.0%
+4,763.4%
-56.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | -1.2% | +2.7% | +1.8% |
| 7D | +13.6% | -0.1% | +13.6% | +13.3% |
| 30D | +42.5% | +10.5% | +32.1% | +38.7% |
| 3M | +7.1% | +44.3% | -37.2% | -3.8% |
| 6M | +199.7% | +59.4% | +140.2% | +155.0% |
| YTD | +643.2% | +49.5% | +593.7% | +543.0% |
| 1Y | +2,402.0% | +62.7% | +2,339.3% | +2,000.9% |
| All | +4,800.5% | +37.0% | +4,763.4% | +4,370.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling