+2,288.9%
SNDK vs LDOS
+2.7%
+2,286.2%
-65.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.0% | +1.1% | -4.1% | -2.9% |
| 7D | -23.7% | +1.9% | -25.5% | -23.6% |
| 30D | -45.6% | +12.8% | -58.4% | -45.4% |
| 3M | -30.5% | -1.0% | -29.5% | -30.1% |
| 6M | -45.0% | +6.2% | -51.2% | -42.0% |
| YTD | +262.3% | -23.2% | +285.5% | +319.1% |
| 1Y | +221.0% | -29.5% | +250.4% | +297.0% |
| All | +2,288.9% | +2.7% | +2,286.2% | +2,003.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling