+4,800.5%
SNDK vs FITB
+31.5%
+4,769.0%
-56.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FITB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | -0.6% | +2.1% | +2.1% |
| 7D | +13.6% | -0.4% | +14.0% | +13.9% |
| 30D | +42.5% | -5.1% | +47.7% | +49.9% |
| 3M | +7.1% | +3.5% | +3.6% | +1.8% |
| 6M | +199.7% | +17.2% | +182.4% | +142.7% |
| YTD | +643.2% | +17.6% | +625.5% | +482.2% |
| 1Y | +2,402.0% | +23.4% | +2,378.7% | +1,740.0% |
| All | +4,800.5% | +31.5% | +4,769.0% | +3,454.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FITB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FITB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FITB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FITB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling