+2,140.1%
SNDK vs DECK
-44.1%
+2,184.2%
-65.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -22.3% | -1.5% | -20.7% | -22.0% |
| 7D | -39.4% | +6.0% | -45.4% | -40.0% |
| 30D | -51.4% | +7.4% | -58.9% | -52.1% |
| 3M | -40.3% | -11.7% | -28.6% | -38.9% |
| 6M | -42.7% | -11.0% | -31.7% | -42.5% |
| YTD | +239.7% | -15.4% | +255.1% | +243.6% |
| 1Y | +272.5% | +7.2% | +265.2% | +249.6% |
| All | +2,140.1% | -44.1% | +2,184.2% | +2,923.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling