-55.1%
SNAP vs NIO
-56.4%
+1.3%
-77.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | +0.6% | +1.2% | +1.7% |
| 7D | -7.3% | +6.9% | -14.2% | -8.6% |
| 30D | -18.9% | -4.7% | -14.2% | -18.1% |
| 3M | -5.3% | -28.1% | +22.8% | +1.3% |
| 6M | -16.9% | -41.7% | +24.8% | -7.7% |
| YTD | -37.4% | -33.1% | -4.3% | -33.4% |
| 1Y | -38.5% | -50.3% | +11.8% | -30.0% |
| 3Y | -55.1% | -54.4% | -0.7% | -53.9% |
| All | -55.1% | -56.4% | +1.3% | -53.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling