+319.5%
SN vs NIO
-74.9%
+394.4%
-42.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -1.6% | +0.5% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -9.3% | -13.0% | +3.7% | -7.8% |
| 30D | -4.8% | -18.3% | +13.5% | -2.5% |
| 3M | +40.4% | -33.2% | +73.6% | +47.0% |
| 6M | +50.9% | -21.5% | +72.4% | +53.8% |
| YTD | +54.9% | -25.5% | +80.4% | +58.6% |
| 1Y | +43.0% | -38.0% | +81.0% | +48.6% |
| 3Y | +391.8% | -65.5% | +457.3% | +392.6% |
| All | +319.5% | -74.9% | +394.4% | +264.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling