+215.6%
SMH vs ZETA
+348.6%
-133.0%
-35.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.0% | -1.7% | -1.3% | -2.7% |
| 7D | +4.9% | +18.1% | -13.2% | +2.3% |
| 30D | -13.8% | +13.6% | -27.4% | -15.4% |
| 3M | -17.4% | +23.7% | -41.1% | -20.0% |
| 6M | -15.0% | +128.5% | -143.5% | -25.6% |
| YTD | +35.2% | +80.1% | -44.9% | +21.4% |
| 1Y | +41.6% | +98.0% | -56.4% | +25.0% |
| 3Y | +215.6% | +348.6% | -133.0% | +126.3% |
| All | +215.6% | +348.6% | -133.0% | +126.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling