+279.8%
SMH vs NIO
-62.6%
+342.4%
-35.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | -1.6% | +4.2% | +2.8% |
| 7D | +2.5% | -13.0% | +15.6% | +4.3% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -18.3% | +17.8% | +2.1% |
| 3M | -9.6% | -33.2% | +23.6% | -4.9% |
| 6M | +42.1% | -21.5% | +63.6% | +45.7% |
| YTD | +57.4% | -25.5% | +82.9% | +62.2% |
| 1Y | +96.2% | -38.0% | +134.2% | +105.9% |
| All | +279.8% | -62.6% | +342.4% | +293.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling