+282.9%
SMH vs LNT
+46.9%
+236.0%
-35.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | 0.0% | +1.5% | +1.5% |
| 7D | +0.3% | -1.0% | +1.3% | 0.0% |
| 30D | -2.8% | -4.2% | +1.5% | -3.7% |
| 3M | -6.7% | -6.7% | 0.0% | -8.1% |
| 6M | +41.8% | -3.6% | +45.3% | +40.6% |
| YTD | +57.9% | +5.9% | +52.0% | +58.9% |
| 1Y | +87.6% | +7.3% | +80.4% | +89.2% |
| 3Y | +282.9% | +46.5% | +236.5% | +304.9% |
| All | +282.9% | +46.9% | +236.0% | +304.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling