+267.1%
SMH vs GLDM
+128.8%
+138.3%
-35.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.6% | -0.9% | +3.5% | +2.9% |
| 7D | +2.5% | -0.5% | +3.0% | +2.7% |
| 30D | -0.5% | +4.4% | -4.9% | -1.9% |
| 3M | -9.6% | -1.1% | -8.6% | -9.5% |
| 6M | +42.1% | -13.7% | +55.7% | +46.6% |
| YTD | +57.4% | +2.8% | +54.7% | +57.2% |
| 1Y | +96.2% | +24.8% | +71.4% | +88.5% |
| All | +267.1% | +128.8% | +138.3% | +214.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling