+277.4%
SMH vs FERG
+50.8%
+226.5%
-35.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FERG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.4% | -1.0% | -1.4% | -1.9% |
| 7D | +1.4% | -1.0% | +2.4% | +1.9% |
| 30D | -2.2% | -11.8% | +9.6% | +4.0% |
| 3M | -1.9% | -1.2% | -0.6% | -1.7% |
| 6M | +41.0% | -2.3% | +43.3% | +41.5% |
| YTD | +55.6% | +0.8% | +54.8% | +53.5% |
| 1Y | +86.8% | +0.5% | +86.3% | +83.4% |
| All | +277.4% | +50.8% | +226.5% | +197.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FERG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FERG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FERG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FERG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling