+286.8%
SMH vs ECHO
+405.9%
-119.1%
-35.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -2.2% | +2.3% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +4.3% | +5.3% | -1.0% | +3.8% |
| 30D | +0.9% | +2.4% | -1.6% | +0.6% |
| 3M | -2.8% | -21.8% | +19.0% | -1.0% |
| 6M | +45.6% | -16.9% | +62.5% | +47.4% |
| YTD | +59.5% | -16.0% | +75.5% | +60.9% |
| 1Y | +93.4% | +9.3% | +84.2% | +91.1% |
| All | +286.8% | +405.9% | -119.1% | +224.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling