+184.2%
SLV vs ZETA
+280.9%
-96.7%
-52.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | -4.1% | +2.9% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.3% | +2.7% | -3.0% | -0.6% |
| 30D | +6.7% | +15.8% | -9.1% | +5.3% |
| 3M | -10.7% | +35.4% | -46.1% | -13.1% |
| 6M | -20.6% | +67.1% | -87.7% | -24.3% |
| YTD | -7.1% | +54.1% | -61.2% | -11.1% |
| 1Y | +62.0% | +67.8% | -5.8% | +54.0% |
| All | +184.2% | +280.9% | -96.7% | +139.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling