+101.5%
SLV vs KRMN
+32.3%
+69.2%
-52.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -0.7% | 0.0% | -0.6% |
| 7D | +2.5% | -3.4% | +5.9% | +3.2% |
| 30D | +3.3% | -31.8% | +35.1% | +10.9% |
| 3M | -3.6% | -20.0% | +16.5% | -0.2% |
| 6M | -21.8% | -60.5% | +38.7% | -9.1% |
| YTD | -7.8% | -45.8% | +37.9% | +4.0% |
| 1Y | +58.3% | -36.4% | +94.6% | +74.7% |
| All | +101.5% | +32.3% | +69.2% | +102.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling