+3.2%
SLB vs ALHC
+136.3%
-133.1%
-46.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +0.2% |
| 7D | +0.8% | -0.6% | +1.4% | +0.8% |
| 30D | +15.8% | -1.0% | +16.8% | +15.8% |
| 3M | -0.3% | -10.2% | +9.8% | -0.9% |
| 6M | +21.3% | -28.3% | +49.6% | +21.1% |
| YTD | +52.3% | -31.4% | +83.7% | +51.9% |
| 1Y | +63.6% | -16.9% | +80.5% | +62.9% |
| All | +3.2% | +136.3% | -133.1% | +0.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling