+369.0%
SITM vs LDOS
+39.7%
+329.3%
-55.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.5% | +0.5% | +6.0% | +6.4% |
| 7D | +9.7% | -5.4% | +15.1% | +10.9% |
| 30D | +12.7% | +4.9% | +7.8% | +11.6% |
| 3M | -13.4% | +7.2% | -20.6% | -13.9% |
| 6M | +59.6% | -24.2% | +83.9% | +72.6% |
| YTD | +73.3% | -25.8% | +99.1% | +85.5% |
| 1Y | +165.5% | -24.7% | +190.3% | +183.7% |
| All | +369.0% | +39.7% | +329.3% | +273.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling