+70.0%
SHEL vs UMAC
+473.8%
-403.8%
-18.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -2.5% | +3.3% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +4.1% | -3.4% | +7.5% | +4.1% |
| 30D | +8.4% | -15.1% | +23.5% | +8.5% |
| 3M | +13.7% | -10.8% | +24.5% | +13.6% |
| 6M | +12.7% | +15.7% | -3.0% | +11.8% |
| YTD | +35.3% | +80.1% | -44.8% | +33.3% |
| 1Y | +39.4% | +116.7% | -77.3% | +36.9% |
| All | +70.0% | +473.8% | -403.8% | +68.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling