+70.0%
SHEL vs MTZ
+151.6%
-81.5%
-18.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | -3.5% | +3.9% | +0.6% |
| 7D | +3.9% | 0.0% | +4.0% | +3.9% |
| 30D | +7.0% | -14.8% | +21.8% | +7.9% |
| 3M | +12.5% | -30.8% | +43.3% | +14.3% |
| 6M | +14.8% | -22.6% | +37.4% | +14.7% |
| YTD | +34.2% | +6.8% | +27.4% | +29.2% |
| 1Y | +37.0% | +22.1% | +14.9% | +29.7% |
| All | +70.0% | +151.6% | -81.5% | +59.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling