+66.9%
SHEL vs FN
+101.0%
-34.1%
-18.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | +11.7% | -12.7% | -1.3% |
| 7D | -8.8% | 0.0% | -8.8% | -8.9% |
| 30D | +2.3% | -34.3% | +36.6% | +3.2% |
| 3M | +11.6% | -39.9% | +51.4% | +12.8% |
| 6M | +15.7% | -51.8% | +67.5% | +17.7% |
| YTD | +38.6% | -28.1% | +66.7% | +37.8% |
| 1Y | +38.5% | -29.1% | +67.6% | +37.7% |
| 3Y | +66.9% | +102.4% | -35.6% | +53.2% |
| All | +66.9% | +101.0% | -34.1% | +53.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling