+70.3%
SE vs ECHO
+621.2%
-550.9%
-62.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +5.2% | -5.1% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +2.0% | -2.4% | +4.4% | +2.2% |
| 30D | -20.0% | -3.1% | -16.9% | -19.9% |
| 3M | -31.8% | +8.7% | -40.5% | -32.2% |
| 6M | -15.9% | -24.8% | +8.9% | -14.6% |
| YTD | -40.6% | -13.0% | -27.7% | -40.4% |
| 1Y | -50.7% | +33.9% | -84.6% | -51.8% |
| 3Y | +70.3% | +791.8% | -721.5% | +63.5% |
| All | +70.3% | +621.2% | -550.9% | +63.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling