+186.3%
SE vs ECHO
+388.0%
-201.7%
-60.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | 0.0% | -0.9% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -6.1% | +3.4% | -9.5% | -6.3% |
| 30D | -2.5% | +2.4% | -4.8% | -2.6% |
| 3M | +21.7% | -28.0% | +49.7% | +24.3% |
| 6M | +27.0% | -21.2% | +48.2% | +28.7% |
| YTD | -12.1% | -17.4% | +5.3% | -11.4% |
| 1Y | -40.9% | +33.6% | -74.5% | -42.3% |
| All | +186.3% | +388.0% | -201.7% | +157.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling