+85.6%
SCHW vs NIO
-64.4%
+150.0%
-21.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -2.4% | +2.1% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -4.1% | +2.6% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -1.1% | -23.2% | +22.2% | 0.0% |
| 3M | +20.4% | -29.9% | +50.3% | +22.0% |
| 6M | +13.6% | -25.1% | +38.7% | +14.4% |
| YTD | +7.7% | -27.5% | +35.1% | +8.5% |
| 1Y | +15.2% | -41.1% | +56.3% | +16.9% |
| All | +85.6% | -64.4% | +150.0% | +95.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling