+84.0%
SCHG vs STZ
-49.0%
+133.0%
-23.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | STZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | +1.9% | -2.3% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -2.7% | -4.1% | +1.4% | -2.4% |
| 30D | -2.2% | -7.6% | +5.4% | -1.6% |
| 3M | +6.2% | -12.3% | +18.5% | +7.2% |
| 6M | +13.4% | -16.3% | +29.7% | +14.8% |
| YTD | +7.1% | -8.4% | +15.5% | +6.7% |
| 1Y | +12.5% | -10.8% | +23.3% | +12.5% |
| All | +84.0% | -49.0% | +133.0% | +92.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside STZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus STZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × STZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded STZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling