+56.5%
SCHD vs FLNC
-70.4%
+126.9%
-16.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | +2.5% | -2.1% | +0.3% |
| 7D | -2.0% | -4.1% | +2.1% | -1.8% |
| 30D | -0.4% | -24.8% | +24.4% | +0.6% |
| 3M | +5.7% | -59.1% | +64.8% | +9.2% |
| 6M | +11.9% | -42.0% | +53.8% | +12.4% |
| YTD | +26.4% | -49.8% | +76.2% | +26.9% |
| 1Y | +27.6% | +43.1% | -15.5% | +18.7% |
| 3Y | +54.9% | -61.0% | +115.9% | +47.9% |
| All | +56.5% | -70.4% | +126.9% | +45.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling