+95.6%
SCCO vs UMAC
+129.0%
-33.5%
-30.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -2.5% | +2.1% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -2.7% | -3.4% | +0.8% | -2.2% |
| 30D | -0.7% | -15.1% | +14.4% | +0.4% |
| 3M | +8.1% | -10.8% | +18.9% | +6.8% |
| 6M | +4.1% | +15.7% | -11.6% | -4.0% |
| YTD | +41.1% | +80.1% | -39.0% | +18.7% |
| 1Y | +95.6% | +116.7% | -21.2% | +60.9% |
| All | +95.6% | +129.0% | -33.5% | +60.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling