+170.3%
SCCO vs NIO
-60.1%
+230.4%
-39.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -4.9% | +2.5% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -1.9% | -14.5% | +12.5% | +1.5% |
| 30D | -17.4% | -15.0% | -2.5% | -14.4% |
| 3M | -11.7% | -35.6% | +23.9% | -3.1% |
| 6M | -12.1% | -55.7% | +43.5% | +3.6% |
| YTD | +20.9% | -43.1% | +64.0% | +34.5% |
| 1Y | +31.3% | -53.5% | +84.9% | +51.7% |
| 3Y | +170.3% | -59.8% | +230.1% | +201.0% |
| All | +170.3% | -60.1% | +230.4% | +201.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling