+118.2%
SCCO vs KRMN
+14.6%
+103.5%
-30.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -7.2% | -2.4% | -4.9% | -6.7% |
| 7D | -2.7% | -15.1% | +12.4% | +1.0% |
| 30D | -0.2% | -44.5% | +44.3% | +14.6% |
| 3M | +17.8% | -25.0% | +42.8% | +24.2% |
| 6M | +2.3% | -66.5% | +68.8% | +29.6% |
| YTD | +41.6% | -53.0% | +94.6% | +66.3% |
| 1Y | +101.9% | -44.7% | +146.6% | +128.5% |
| All | +118.2% | +14.6% | +103.5% | +105.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling