+59.8%
SAP vs ZM
+38.4%
+21.3%
-52.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +3.3% | -4.1% | -1.9% |
| 7D | -2.9% | +2.9% | -5.8% | -3.8% |
| 30D | +9.0% | +0.7% | +8.3% | +8.6% |
| 3M | +14.9% | -3.7% | +18.6% | +15.4% |
| 6M | +11.9% | +29.9% | -18.0% | +3.4% |
| YTD | -9.9% | +17.4% | -27.3% | -14.4% |
| 1Y | -19.5% | +22.4% | -41.9% | -24.5% |
| All | +59.8% | +38.4% | +21.3% | +37.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling