+59.8%
SAP vs ZETA
+280.9%
-221.2%
-52.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -4.1% | +3.2% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -2.9% | +2.7% | -5.6% | -3.4% |
| 30D | +9.0% | +15.8% | -6.8% | +6.1% |
| 3M | +14.9% | +35.4% | -20.5% | +8.5% |
| 6M | +11.9% | +67.1% | -55.2% | +1.8% |
| YTD | -9.9% | +54.1% | -64.0% | -17.5% |
| 1Y | -19.5% | +67.8% | -87.4% | -27.7% |
| All | +59.8% | +280.9% | -221.2% | +11.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling