+26.0%
SAP vs UMAC
+494.0%
-468.0%
-52.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -3.1% | +2.2% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -2.9% | -0.9% | -2.0% | -2.9% |
| 30D | +9.0% | -7.7% | +16.7% | +9.0% |
| 3M | +14.9% | -26.4% | +41.4% | +15.3% |
| 6M | +11.9% | +61.9% | -50.0% | +10.4% |
| YTD | -9.9% | +86.5% | -96.4% | -11.5% |
| 1Y | -19.5% | +156.3% | -175.8% | -21.7% |
| All | +26.0% | +494.0% | -468.0% | +16.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling