+62.4%
SAP vs LCID
-92.6%
+155.0%
-52.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +1.7% | -2.6% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -2.9% | -6.6% | +3.7% | -2.6% |
| 30D | +9.0% | -30.1% | +39.2% | +11.0% |
| 3M | +14.9% | -17.6% | +32.6% | +15.2% |
| 6M | +11.9% | -54.4% | +66.3% | +15.1% |
| YTD | -9.9% | -55.7% | +45.8% | -7.5% |
| 1Y | -19.5% | -71.0% | +51.5% | -15.9% |
| All | +62.4% | -92.6% | +155.0% | +70.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling