+59.8%
SAP vs GTLB
+1.9%
+57.8%
-52.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +1.1% | -1.9% | -1.1% |
| 7D | -2.9% | +11.1% | -14.0% | -5.3% |
| 30D | +9.0% | +37.8% | -28.8% | +1.1% |
| 3M | +14.9% | +61.6% | -46.6% | +2.9% |
| 6M | +11.9% | +98.9% | -87.0% | -4.5% |
| YTD | -9.9% | +32.8% | -42.7% | -17.7% |
| 1Y | -19.5% | +14.7% | -34.2% | -25.4% |
| All | +59.8% | +1.9% | +57.8% | +45.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling