+62.4%
SAP vs FITB
+128.4%
-66.0%
-52.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FITB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -0.2% | -0.7% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -2.9% | +0.6% | -3.5% | -3.0% |
| 30D | +9.0% | -4.7% | +13.7% | +10.1% |
| 3M | +14.9% | +6.7% | +8.3% | +13.1% |
| 6M | +11.9% | +12.6% | -0.7% | +8.4% |
| YTD | -9.9% | +19.1% | -29.0% | -14.3% |
| 1Y | -19.5% | +22.6% | -42.2% | -24.2% |
| All | +62.4% | +128.4% | -66.0% | +29.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FITB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FITB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FITB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FITB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling