+56.4%
SAP vs ECHO
+242.1%
-185.7%
-52.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | 0.0% | -0.9% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -2.9% | +3.4% | -6.3% | -3.1% |
| 30D | +9.0% | +2.4% | +6.7% | +8.8% |
| 3M | +14.9% | -28.0% | +42.9% | +17.4% |
| 6M | +11.9% | -21.2% | +33.1% | +13.2% |
| YTD | -9.9% | -17.4% | +7.5% | -9.2% |
| 1Y | -19.5% | +33.6% | -53.1% | -21.8% |
| 3Y | +61.8% | +419.7% | -357.9% | +31.9% |
| All | +56.4% | +242.1% | -185.7% | +32.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling