+41.3%
SAP vs ABCL
+120.4%
-79.1%
-25.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | -9.4% | +10.8% | +1.6% |
| 7D | +4.0% | -14.9% | +18.9% | +4.4% |
| 30D | +15.7% | -15.4% | +31.1% | +16.1% |
| 3M | +23.4% | +88.0% | -64.6% | +21.0% |
| 6M | +41.3% | +138.8% | -97.6% | +35.1% |
| All | +41.3% | +120.4% | -79.1% | +35.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling