+303.4%
SAN vs UMAC
+488.3%
-184.8%
-20.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.3% | -3.2% | +2.9% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -2.8% | -4.0% | +1.2% | -2.7% |
| 30D | -0.5% | -9.4% | +8.9% | -0.5% |
| 3M | +22.7% | +3.0% | +19.8% | +22.2% |
| 6M | +28.8% | +27.2% | +1.6% | +27.2% |
| YTD | +26.3% | +84.7% | -58.4% | +23.8% |
| 1Y | +48.8% | +136.5% | -87.6% | +45.2% |
| All | +303.4% | +488.3% | -184.8% | +307.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling