+588.9%
RVMD vs NTNX
+54.0%
+534.9%
-56.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTNX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | +0.8% | -0.6% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -3.0% | -3.1% | +0.2% | -2.1% |
| 30D | -0.7% | +2.0% | -2.7% | -1.4% |
| 3M | +36.5% | +34.0% | +2.6% | +25.5% |
| 6M | +104.6% | +72.4% | +32.2% | +74.1% |
| YTD | +155.8% | +27.5% | +128.3% | +134.1% |
| 1Y | +340.7% | -18.7% | +359.4% | +350.9% |
| 3Y | +519.9% | +80.8% | +439.2% | +361.2% |
| All | +588.9% | +54.0% | +534.9% | +483.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTNX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTNX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTNX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTNX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling