+152.8%
RTX vs ZTS
-57.7%
+210.5%
-19.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -0.6% | 0.0% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -5.2% | -2.0% | -3.2% | -4.9% |
| 30D | -9.4% | +1.9% | -11.3% | -9.7% |
| 3M | +12.3% | -4.0% | +16.3% | +12.7% |
| 6M | -3.1% | -39.1% | +36.0% | +2.7% |
| YTD | +10.7% | -38.8% | +49.5% | +17.2% |
| 1Y | +28.4% | -49.6% | +78.0% | +39.9% |
| All | +152.8% | -57.7% | +210.5% | +173.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling