+144.2%
RTX vs ZETA
+273.0%
-128.8%
-20.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | +5.3% | -6.5% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -5.1% | -0.4% | -4.7% | -5.1% |
| 30D | +5.1% | -8.0% | +13.2% | +5.4% |
| 3M | -14.8% | +21.4% | -36.2% | -15.6% |
| 6M | +8.0% | +80.1% | -72.1% | +5.0% |
| YTD | +4.5% | +52.5% | -48.0% | +2.0% |
| 1Y | +9.8% | +58.5% | -48.6% | +6.9% |
| 3Y | +144.2% | +281.7% | -137.5% | +109.7% |
| All | +144.2% | +273.0% | -128.8% | +109.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling