+159.2%
RTX vs NIO
-54.9%
+214.1%
-20.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.0% | -3.8% | +5.8% | +2.1% |
| 7D | -1.7% | +2.8% | -4.6% | -1.8% |
| 30D | +7.7% | -8.4% | +16.1% | +7.8% |
| 3M | -10.3% | -32.0% | +21.6% | -9.8% |
| 6M | +14.6% | -43.9% | +58.5% | +15.6% |
| YTD | +10.4% | -35.7% | +46.1% | +11.0% |
| 1Y | +13.5% | -51.1% | +64.6% | +14.6% |
| All | +159.2% | -54.9% | +214.1% | +165.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling