+144.2%
RTX vs NIO
-59.9%
+204.1%
-20.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | +5.9% | -7.2% | -1.3% |
| 7D | -5.1% | +5.6% | -10.7% | -5.2% |
| 30D | +5.1% | -4.2% | +9.4% | +5.2% |
| 3M | -14.8% | -26.3% | +11.5% | -14.4% |
| 6M | +8.0% | -42.5% | +50.6% | +9.0% |
| YTD | +4.5% | -33.5% | +38.0% | +5.0% |
| 1Y | +9.8% | -52.7% | +62.5% | +10.9% |
| 3Y | +144.2% | -57.5% | +201.7% | +150.3% |
| All | +144.2% | -59.9% | +204.1% | +150.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling