+11.7%
RTX vs NCLH
+9.1%
+2.6%
-20.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | NCLH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.5% | -4.0% | +2.6% | -1.1% |
| 7D | +3.4% | +1.7% | +1.7% | +3.3% |
| 30D | +8.4% | +17.9% | -9.5% | +7.0% |
| 3M | -10.7% | -4.5% | -6.1% | -10.7% |
| 6M | +11.7% | +12.9% | -1.2% | +5.3% |
| All | +11.7% | +9.1% | +2.6% | +5.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NCLH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NCLH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NCLH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NCLH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling