+172.9%
RTX vs MCK
+112.3%
+60.6%
-19.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MCK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | +0.1% | -0.3% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -1.5% | -2.9% | +1.4% | -1.1% |
| 30D | -11.0% | +0.4% | -11.4% | -11.1% |
| 3M | +7.7% | +12.1% | -4.4% | +5.7% |
| 6M | -3.9% | -5.4% | +1.5% | -3.6% |
| YTD | +9.0% | +7.8% | +1.2% | +7.3% |
| 1Y | +27.3% | +22.9% | +4.3% | +22.9% |
| 3Y | +172.9% | +110.7% | +62.2% | +137.3% |
| All | +172.9% | +112.3% | +60.6% | +137.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MCK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MCK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MCK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MCK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling