+27.3%
RTX vs IEMG
+31.6%
-4.3%
-19.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | IEMG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | +1.2% | -1.4% | -0.3% |
| 7D | -1.5% | -1.3% | -0.3% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -11.0% | +1.9% | -12.9% | -11.2% |
| 3M | +7.7% | +1.4% | +6.3% | +7.0% |
| 6M | -3.9% | +15.2% | -19.1% | -9.1% |
| YTD | +9.0% | +23.8% | -14.9% | -0.8% |
| 1Y | +27.3% | +30.7% | -3.4% | +12.3% |
| All | +27.3% | +31.6% | -4.3% | +12.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IEMG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IEMG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IEMG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IEMG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling