+173.5%
RTX vs FLNC
-63.7%
+237.3%
-19.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -4.2% | +4.5% | +0.3% |
| 7D | -2.0% | -5.0% | +3.0% | -1.9% |
| 30D | -11.2% | -26.1% | +14.9% | -11.0% |
| 3M | +12.0% | -55.2% | +67.2% | +12.7% |
| 6M | -3.6% | -42.6% | +39.0% | -3.6% |
| YTD | +9.2% | -51.0% | +60.2% | +9.3% |
| 1Y | +29.7% | +43.3% | -13.6% | +27.3% |
| All | +173.5% | -63.7% | +237.3% | +171.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling