+172.7%
RTX vs CLSK
+202.5%
-29.8%
-19.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLSK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -1.5% | +0.8% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -1.6% | +17.2% | -18.8% | -1.9% |
| 30D | -11.6% | +14.6% | -26.1% | -11.8% |
| 3M | +9.2% | -16.8% | +26.0% | +9.3% |
| 6M | -4.4% | +38.2% | -42.6% | -5.3% |
| YTD | +8.9% | +31.2% | -22.3% | +7.9% |
| 1Y | +32.1% | +37.3% | -5.2% | +30.3% |
| All | +172.7% | +202.5% | -29.8% | +147.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLSK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLSK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLSK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLSK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling