+150.6%
RTX vs ARMK
+114.7%
+35.9%
-19.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | -0.9% | +0.2% | -0.5% |
| 7D | -5.2% | -2.4% | -2.8% | -4.8% |
| 30D | -9.4% | 0.0% | -9.4% | -9.4% |
| 3M | +12.3% | +6.7% | +5.6% | +11.0% |
| 6M | -3.1% | +38.8% | -41.9% | -8.7% |
| YTD | +10.7% | +55.2% | -44.5% | +1.8% |
| 1Y | +28.4% | +46.6% | -18.2% | +19.4% |
| All | +150.6% | +114.7% | +35.9% | +105.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling