+27.9%
RSG vs UMAC
+508.0%
-480.1%
-22.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | -6.4% | +6.8% | +0.3% |
| 7D | 0.0% | +3.3% | -3.3% | 0.0% |
| 30D | +3.7% | -10.4% | +14.0% | +3.6% |
| 3M | +6.2% | +1.8% | +4.4% | +6.4% |
| 6M | -2.8% | +40.7% | -43.5% | -2.6% |
| YTD | +5.9% | +90.9% | -85.0% | +6.1% |
| 1Y | -1.8% | +151.8% | -153.5% | -1.7% |
| All | +27.9% | +508.0% | -480.1% | +27.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling