+12.9%
RRX vs UMAC
+129.0%
-116.1%
-34.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.7% | -2.5% | +6.2% | +3.9% |
| 7D | -0.3% | -3.4% | +3.1% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -6.1% | -15.1% | +9.0% | -5.2% |
| 3M | -23.1% | -10.8% | -12.3% | -23.5% |
| 6M | -19.5% | +15.7% | -35.2% | -22.1% |
| YTD | +16.1% | +80.1% | -64.1% | +7.4% |
| 1Y | +12.9% | +116.7% | -103.8% | +4.7% |
| All | +12.9% | +129.0% | -116.1% | +4.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling